I should post this at the Second Life Facebook page, since it is a follow-up on last
night's Evidence Explaineddiscussion.
Background: 3-1/2 years ago (when I
was VERY green) a distant cousin sent me a decendancy report with lots
of citations and notes. He sent it as a way of helping
me learn what I should do. At that time I just used it to explore how
to do in Reunion what he had done in Family Tree Maker. I saved the
entire email correspondence and went on to the next thing.
Since working with the Greenwood book, Researchers Guide to American Genealogy, I have been creating the logs I
should have done then. A death listing which was on "Rootsweb.com" when Mike
compiled this report is NOW on "ingenweb.org". I am building my source
citation now. I am not sure if this reference to the material supplied
by Mike should include the location where he found the information or
not. If so, do I also cite the new location? Or does all this that I'm
outlining here go into the Search Log?
The basic question is: which approach will give the best information to someone wishing to follow my research?
I am making a screen capture of the website and saving it to my files. I always do that since the web tends to evaporate.
Explaining the journey we take in our ancestral quest is very important, and your research log is a great way to keep track of things. Yes, cite every instance of information you find about your ancestor whether email, online, or off line.
Compiling an accurate research log permits folks to see what sources you considered when compiling info about each ancestor.
In comments on your research log, note the source of death info on
IndianaGenWeb site appears to be same as provided to you via email years
If the information on RootsWeb.com now on IndianaGenWeb's site is merely a new web address for the same page, then list both, and the approximate dates you consulted each site. This has happened to a lot of USGenWeb sites that formerly had their own sub-domains at RootsWeb, but chose not to have their work incorporated into Ancestry.com properties after Ancestry purchased RootsWeb.
I do have a follow-up blog post with some additional ideas for dealing with "who provided the info".